DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Mitsubishi L 200 vs 2018 Isuzu D-Max Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Isuzu D-Max

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 13.25 points.

62.5–75.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeIsuzu
L 200ModelD-Max
2012Model year2018
Pick-upBody typePick-up
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

14,0 s0–100 km/h—
167 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2477 ccEngine displacement2999 cc
136 HPPower177 HP
314 NmTorque430 Nm
—Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
75 ltFuel tank0 lt
8,9 ltUrban consumption—
6,8 ltExtra-urban consumption—
7,5 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
5Gears6 Aisin
—Tyre size38/15,5 R20
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5185 mmLength5500 mm
1750 mmWidth2150 mm
1775 mmHeight2100 mm
1870 KgWeight—
3000 mmWheelbase—

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Mitsubishi L 200 and 2018 Isuzu D-Max approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Isuzu D-Max leads the E-Kıyasla score by 13.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…