DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2010 Mitsubishi L 200 vs 2010 Chrysler PT Cruiser Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Chrysler PT Cruiser

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

62.5–63.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeChrysler
L 200ModelPT Cruiser
2010Model year2010
Pick-upBody typeEstate
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

14,0 s0–100 km/h10,3 s
167 km/hTop speed180 km/h
2477 ccEngine displacement2429 cc
136 HPPower150 HP
314 NmTorque229 Nm
—Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
75 ltFuel tank57 lt
8,9 ltUrban consumption11,8 lt
6,8 ltExtra-urban consumption8,1 lt
7,5 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
—Tyre size205/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5185 mmLength4290 mm
1750 mmWidth1705 mm
1775 mmHeight1600 mm
1870 KgWeight1420 Kg
3000 mmWheelbase2616 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2010 Mitsubishi L 200 and 2010 Chrysler PT Cruiser approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Chrysler PT Cruiser leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…