DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2010 Opel Antara vs 2010 Mitsubishi L 200 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Opel Antara

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

63.25–62.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

OpelMakeMitsubishi
AntaraModelL 200
2010Model year2010
SUVBody typePick-up
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

11,9 s0–100 km/h14,0 s
175 km/hTop speed167 km/h
2405 ccEngine displacement2477 cc
150 HPPower136 HP
220 NmTorque314 Nm
4Cylinders—

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
0 ltFuel tank75 lt
13,3 ltUrban consumption8,9 lt
7,3 ltExtra-urban consumption6,8 lt
9,6 ltAverage consumption7,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
5Gears5
225/70 R16Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4575 mmLength5185 mm
1850 mmWidth1750 mm
1704 mmHeight1775 mm
—Weight1870 Kg
2707 mmWheelbase3000 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2010 Opel Antara and 2010 Mitsubishi L 200 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Opel Antara leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…