DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2006 Mitsubishi L 200 vs 2006 Opel Antara Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Opel Antara

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

62.5–63.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeOpel
L 200ModelAntara
2006Model year2006
Pick-upBody typeSUV
4Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h11,9 s
142 km/hTop speed175 km/h
2351 ccEngine displacement2405 cc
132 HPPower150 HP
192 NmTorque220 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
75 ltFuel tank0 lt
—Urban consumption13,3 lt
—Extra-urban consumption7,3 lt
—Average consumption9,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
5Gears5
205/80 R16Tyre size225/70 R16
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4500 mmLength4575 mm
1655 mmWidth1850 mm
1570 mmHeight1704 mm
1660 KgWeight—
2230 mmWheelbase2707 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2006 Mitsubishi L 200 and 2006 Opel Antara approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Opel Antara leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…