2006 • Opel
Antara
Opel Antara 2.4 i 16V (150 Hp) 2006Overall Score63.25/100
2006 Opel Antara vs 2006 Mitsubishi L 200 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2006 • Mitsubishi
L 200
Mitsubishi L 200 2.4 4x4 (132 Hp) 2006Overall Score62.5/100
WINNER
Opel Antara
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
63.25–62.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Opel AntaraSpecificationMitsubishi L 200
OpelMakeMitsubishi
AntaraModelL 200
2006Model year2006
SUVBody typePick-up
5Seats4
5Doors4
Performance
Opel AntaraSpecificationMitsubishi L 200
11,9 s0–100 km/h—
175 km/hTop speed142 km/h
2405 ccEngine displacement2351 cc
150 HPPower132 HP
220 NmTorque192 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Opel AntaraSpecificationMitsubishi L 200
PetrolFuel typePetrol
0 ltFuel tank75 lt
13,3 ltUrban consumption—
7,3 ltExtra-urban consumption—
9,6 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Dimensions
Opel AntaraSpecificationMitsubishi L 200
4575 mmLength4500 mm
1850 mmWidth1655 mm
1704 mmHeight1570 mm
—Weight1660 Kg
2707 mmWheelbase2230 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2006 Opel Antara and 2006 Mitsubishi L 200 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Opel Antara leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…