DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Jaguar XJ vs 2004 Mitsubishi GTO Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi GTO

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

73.5–74.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

JaguarMakeMitsubishi
XJModelGTO
2004Model year2004
SedanBody typeCoupe
5Seats2
4Doors2

Performance

8,1 s0–100 km/h—
233 km/hTop speed220 km/h
2967 ccEngine displacement2972 cc
238 HPPower225 HP
293 NmTorque275 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
85 ltFuel tank75 lt
15,3 ltUrban consumption—
7,7 ltExtra-urban consumption—
10,5 ltAverage consumption8,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears5
235/45 R17Tyre size225/50 R17 V
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5090 mmLength4575 mm
1860 mmWidth1840 mm
1448 mmHeight1285 mm
1545 KgWeight1640 Kg
3034 mmWheelbase2470 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Jaguar XJ and 2004 Mitsubishi GTO approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi GTO leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…