DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Mitsubishi GTO vs 2004 Volkswagen Phaeton Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi GTO

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

74.5–73.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeVolkswagen
GTOModelPhaeton
2004Model year2004
CoupeBody typeSedan
2Seats5
2Doors4

Performance

—0–100 km/h8,8 s
220 km/hTop speed237 km/h
2972 ccEngine displacement2967 cc
225 HPPower224 HP
275 NmTorque450 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
75 ltFuel tank90 lt
—Urban consumption12,9 lt
—Extra-urban consumption7,7 lt
8,9 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
225/50 R17 VTyre size235/55 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4575 mmLength5055 mm
1840 mmWidth1903 mm
1285 mmHeight1450 mm
1640 KgWeight2255 Kg
2470 mmWheelbase2881 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Mitsubishi GTO and 2004 Volkswagen Phaeton approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi GTO leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…