DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Mitsubishi GTO vs 2000 Jaguar S-type Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi GTO

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

74.5–73.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeJaguar
GTOModelS-type
2000Model year2000
CoupeBody typeSedan
2Seats5
2Doors4

Performance

—0–100 km/h7,9 s
220 km/hTop speed235 km/h
2972 ccEngine displacement2967 cc
225 HPPower238 HP
275 NmTorque293 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
75 ltFuel tank68 lt
—Urban consumption16,3 lt
—Extra-urban consumption8,2 lt
8,9 ltAverage consumption11,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears6
225/50 R17 VTyre size225/55 R16 W
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4575 mmLength4861 mm
1840 mmWidth1819 mm
1285 mmHeight1441 mm
1640 KgWeight1705 Kg
2470 mmWheelbase2909 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Mitsubishi GTO and 2000 Jaguar S-type approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi GTO leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…