DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Mitsubishi GTO vs 2000 Volvo S80 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo S80

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

78.75–79.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeVolvo
GTOModelS80
2000Model year2000
CoupeBody typeSedan
2Seats5
2Doors4

Performance

—0–100 km/h7,2 s
0 km/hTop speed250 km/h
2972 ccEngine displacement2783 cc
280 HPPower272 HP
417 NmTorque380 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
75 ltFuel tank80 lt
—Urban consumption16,6 lt
—Extra-urban consumption8,2 lt
9,3 ltAverage consumption12,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears4
235/45 R17Tyre size225/50 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4575 mmLength4822 mm
1840 mmWidth1832 mm
1285 mmHeight1434 mm
1710 KgWeight1630 Kg
2470 mmWheelbase2791 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Mitsubishi GTO and 2000 Volvo S80 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo S80 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…