2000 • Alpina
B3
Alpina B3 3.3 i 24V (280 Hp) 2000Overall Score79.5/100
2000 Alpina B3 vs 2000 Mitsubishi GTO Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Mitsubishi
GTO
Mitsubishi GTO 3.0 i V6 24V 4WD Turbo (280 Hp) 2000Overall Score78.75/100
WINNER
Alpina B3
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
79.5–78.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Alpina B3SpecificationMitsubishi GTO
AlpinaMakeMitsubishi
B3ModelGTO
2000Model year2000
SedanBody typeCoupe
5Seats2
4Doors2
Performance
Alpina B3SpecificationMitsubishi GTO
5,7 s0–100 km/h—
266 km/hTop speed0 km/h
3300 ccEngine displacement2972 cc
280 HPPower280 HP
335 NmTorque417 Nm
6Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Alpina B3SpecificationMitsubishi GTO
PetrolFuel typePetrol
63 ltFuel tank75 lt
16,1 ltUrban consumption—
7,7 ltExtra-urban consumption—
10,8 ltAverage consumption9,3 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Alpina B3SpecificationMitsubishi GTO
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears6
225/40 ZR18; 255/35 ZR18Tyre size235/45 R17
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Alpina B3SpecificationMitsubishi GTO
4471 mmLength4575 mm
1739 mmWidth1840 mm
1395 mmHeight1285 mm
1450 KgWeight1710 Kg
2725 mmWheelbase2470 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Alpina B3 and 2000 Mitsubishi GTO approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Alpina B3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…