DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Mitsubishi GTO vs 2000 Alpina B3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Alpina B3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

78.75–79.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeAlpina
GTOModelB3
2000Model year2000
CoupeBody typeSedan
2Seats5
2Doors4

Performance

—0–100 km/h5,7 s
0 km/hTop speed266 km/h
2972 ccEngine displacement3300 cc
280 HPPower280 HP
417 NmTorque335 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
75 ltFuel tank63 lt
—Urban consumption16,1 lt
—Extra-urban consumption7,7 lt
9,3 ltAverage consumption10,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears6
235/45 R17Tyre size225/40 ZR18; 255/35 ZR18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4575 mmLength4471 mm
1840 mmWidth1739 mm
1285 mmHeight1395 mm
1710 KgWeight1450 Kg
2470 mmWheelbase2725 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Mitsubishi GTO and 2000 Alpina B3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Alpina B3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…