DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2006 Mitsubishi Galant vs 2004 Holden Monaro Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi Galant

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

71.5–70.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeHolden
GalantModelMonaro
2006Model year2004
SedanBody typeCoupe
5Seats4
4Doors2

Performance

—0–100 km/h8,5 s
0 km/hTop speed210 km/h
3828 ccEngine displacement3791 cc
230 HPPower233 HP
250 NmTorque375 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
67 ltFuel tank75 lt
13,1 ltUrban consumption12,5 lt
8,7 ltExtra-urban consumption7,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears4
215/60 R16Tyre size205/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4865 mmLength4790 mm
1840 mmWidth1840 mm
1485 mmHeight1400 mm
1560 KgWeight1600 Kg
2750 mmWheelbase2790 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2006 Mitsubishi Galant and 2004 Holden Monaro approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi Galant leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…