DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Holden Monaro vs 2006 Mitsubishi Galant Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi Galant

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

70.75–71.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

HoldenMakeMitsubishi
MonaroModelGalant
2004Model year2006
CoupeBody typeSedan
4Seats5
2Doors4

Performance

8,5 s0–100 km/h—
210 km/hTop speed0 km/h
3791 ccEngine displacement3828 cc
233 HPPower230 HP
375 NmTorque250 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
75 ltFuel tank67 lt
12,5 ltUrban consumption13,1 lt
7,6 ltExtra-urban consumption8,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
205/65 R15Tyre size215/60 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4790 mmLength4865 mm
1840 mmWidth1840 mm
1400 mmHeight1485 mm
1600 KgWeight1560 Kg
2790 mmWheelbase2750 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Holden Monaro and 2006 Mitsubishi Galant approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi Galant leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…