DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2006 Mitsubishi Galant vs 2005 Ford Mustang Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Mustang

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

71.5–72.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeFord
GalantModelMustang
2006Model year2005
SedanBody typeCabriolet
5Seats2+2
4Doors2

Performance

0 km/hTop speed180 km/h
3828 ccEngine displacement3813 cc
230 HPPower190 HP
250 NmTorque220 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
67 ltFuel tank58 lt
13,1 ltUrban consumption11,8 lt
8,7 ltExtra-urban consumption7,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears4
215/60 R16Tyre size205/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4865 mmLength4653 mm
1840 mmWidth1857 mm
1485 mmHeight1350 mm
1560 KgWeight1455 Kg
2750 mmWheelbase2573 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2006 Mitsubishi Galant and 2005 Ford Mustang approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Mustang leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…