DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Mitsubishi Galant vs 2005 Holden Caprice Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi Galant

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

68.5–67.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeHolden
GalantModelCaprice
2004Model year2005
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

—0–100 km/h9,7 s
0 km/hTop speed0 km/h
3828 ccEngine displacement3791 cc
230 HPPower200 HP
250 NmTorque304 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
67 ltFuel tank75 lt
13,1 ltUrban consumption12 lt
8,7 ltExtra-urban consumption7,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears4
215/60 R16Tyre size225/55 R16 V
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4865 mmLength5237 mm
1840 mmWidth1847 mm
1485 mmHeight1459 mm
1560 KgWeight1690 Kg
2750 mmWheelbase2939 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Mitsubishi Galant and 2005 Holden Caprice approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi Galant leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…