DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2005 Holden Caprice vs 2004 Mitsubishi Galant Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi Galant

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

67.75–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

HoldenMakeMitsubishi
CapriceModelGalant
2005Model year2004
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

9,7 s0–100 km/h—
0 km/hTop speed0 km/h
3791 ccEngine displacement3828 cc
200 HPPower230 HP
304 NmTorque250 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
75 ltFuel tank67 lt
12 ltUrban consumption13,1 lt
7,4 ltExtra-urban consumption8,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
225/55 R16 VTyre size215/60 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5237 mmLength4865 mm
1847 mmWidth1840 mm
1459 mmHeight1485 mm
1690 KgWeight1560 Kg
2939 mmWheelbase2750 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2005 Holden Caprice and 2004 Mitsubishi Galant approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi Galant leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…