DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Mitsubishi Galant vs 2000 Holden Frontera Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Holden Frontera

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

65.5–66.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeHolden
GalantModelFrontera
2000Model year2000
SedanBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

9,0 s0–100 km/h9,0 s
204 km/hTop speed192 km/h
2972 ccEngine displacement3165 cc
197 HPPower205 HP
278 NmTorque290 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
62 ltFuel tank80 lt
12 ltUrban consumption17 lt
8,7 ltExtra-urban consumption10,1 lt
11,8 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
4Gears5
205/55 R16Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4770 mmLength4680 mm
1740 mmWidth1785 mm
1415 mmHeight1690 mm
1520 KgWeight1785 Kg
2623 mmWheelbase2700 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Mitsubishi Galant and 2000 Holden Frontera approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Holden Frontera leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…