DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Chrysler Concorde vs 2000 Mitsubishi Galant Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Chrysler Concorde

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

66.25–65.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ChryslerMakeMitsubishi
ConcordeModelGalant
2000Model year2000
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

8,8 s0–100 km/h9,0 s
187 km/hTop speed204 km/h
2736 ccEngine displacement2972 cc
203 HPPower197 HP
258 NmTorque278 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
65 ltFuel tank62 lt
11,8 ltUrban consumption12 lt
8,4 ltExtra-urban consumption8,7 lt
—Average consumption11,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears4
225/60 R16Tyre size205/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5310 mmLength4770 mm
1900 mmWidth1740 mm
1420 mmHeight1415 mm
1570 KgWeight1520 Kg
2870 mmWheelbase2623 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Chrysler Concorde and 2000 Mitsubishi Galant approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Chrysler Concorde leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…