DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Mitsubishi Galant vs 1999 Ford Taurus Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi Galant

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

65.5–64.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeFord
GalantModelTaurus
2000Model year1999
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

9,0 s0–100 km/h10,1 s
204 km/hTop speed210 km/h
2972 ccEngine displacement2967 cc
197 HPPower200 HP
278 NmTorque271 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
62 ltFuel tank61 lt
12 ltUrban consumption11,8 lt
8,7 ltExtra-urban consumption8,1 lt
11,8 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears4
205/55 R16Tyre size205/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4770 mmLength5016 mm
1740 mmWidth1854 mm
1415 mmHeight1400 mm
1520 KgWeight1522 Kg
2623 mmWheelbase2756 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Mitsubishi Galant and 1999 Ford Taurus approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi Galant leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…