DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Mitsubishi Galant vs 2000 Land Rover Freelander Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi Galant

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

65.5–65.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeLand Rover
GalantModelFreelander
2000Model year2000
HatchbackBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
5Doors3

Performance

8,9 s0–100 km/h11,1 s
216 km/hTop speed182 km/h
2497 ccEngine displacement2497 cc
170 HPPower177 HP
216 NmTorque240 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
64 ltFuel tank60 lt
—Urban consumption17,2 lt
—Extra-urban consumption9,7 lt
10,5 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
5Gears4
205/60 R15Tyre size215/65 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4620 mmLength4433 mm
1730 mmWidth1809 mm
1405 mmHeight1709 mm
1545 KgWeight1550 Kg
2635 mmWheelbase2557 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Mitsubishi Galant and 2000 Land Rover Freelander approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi Galant leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…