DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Land Rover Freelander vs 2000 Mitsubishi Galant Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi Galant

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

65.25–65.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Land RoverMakeMitsubishi
FreelanderModelGalant
2000Model year2000
Off-road vehicleBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
3Doors5

Performance

11,1 s0–100 km/h8,9 s
182 km/hTop speed216 km/h
2497 ccEngine displacement2497 cc
177 HPPower170 HP
240 NmTorque216 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank64 lt
17,2 ltUrban consumption—
9,7 ltExtra-urban consumption—
—Average consumption10,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
4Gears5
215/65 R16Tyre size205/60 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4433 mmLength4620 mm
1809 mmWidth1730 mm
1709 mmHeight1405 mm
1550 KgWeight1545 Kg
2557 mmWheelbase2635 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Land Rover Freelander and 2000 Mitsubishi Galant approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi Galant leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…