2000 • Mitsubishi
FTO
Mitsubishi FTO 3.0 i V6 24V (225 Hp) 2000Overall Score68.5/100
2000 Mitsubishi FTO vs 2000 Toyota Sienna Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Toyota
Sienna
Toyota Sienna 3.0 V6 24V (197 Hp) 2000Overall Score69.25/100
WINNER
Toyota Sienna
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
68.5–69.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mitsubishi FTOSpecificationToyota Sienna
MitsubishiMakeToyota
FTOModelSienna
2000Model year2000
CoupeBody typeMinivan
2Seats5
2Doors5
Performance
Mitsubishi FTOSpecificationToyota Sienna
0 km/hTop speed180 km/h
2972 ccEngine displacement2995 cc
225 HPPower197 HP
275 NmTorque284 Nm
6Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Mitsubishi FTOSpecificationToyota Sienna
PetrolFuel typePetrol
75 ltFuel tank79 lt
—Urban consumption13,1 lt
—Extra-urban consumption9,8 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Mitsubishi FTOSpecificationToyota Sienna
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
225/50 R17Tyre size205/70 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Mitsubishi FTOSpecificationToyota Sienna
4590 mmLength4910 mm
1840 mmWidth1860 mm
1285 mmHeight1710 mm
1670 KgWeight1705 Kg
2470 mmWheelbase2900 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Mitsubishi FTO and 2000 Toyota Sienna approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Toyota Sienna leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VSImage unavailableChrysler Intrepid vs Mitsubishi FTO2000 and 2000 model yearsVSImage unavailableToyota Sienna vs Mitsubishi FTO2000 and 2000 model yearsImage unavailableVSImage unavailableMitsubishi FTO vs Mitsubishi FTO1999 and 2000 model years
VSImage unavailableAlfa Romeo 166 vs Mitsubishi FTO1999 and 2000 model yearsImage unavailableVSImage unavailableLincoln LS vs Mitsubishi FTO2000 and 2000 model yearsComments are loading…