DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1999 Mitsubishi FTO vs 2000 Mitsubishi FTO Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi FTO

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

67.5–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeMitsubishi
FTOModelFTO
1999Model year2000
CoupeBody typeCoupe
2Seats2
2Doors2

Performance

0 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2972 ccEngine displacement2972 cc
225 HPPower225 HP
275 NmTorque275 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
75 ltFuel tank75 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
225/50 R17Tyre size225/50 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4590 mmLength4590 mm
1840 mmWidth1840 mm
1285 mmHeight1285 mm
1670 KgWeight1670 Kg
2470 mmWheelbase2470 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1999 Mitsubishi FTO and 2000 Mitsubishi FTO approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi FTO leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…