2000 • Mitsubishi
FTO
Mitsubishi FTO 3.0 i V6 24V (225 Hp) 2000Overall Score68.5/100
2000 Mitsubishi FTO vs 2000 Lincoln LS Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Lincoln
LS
Lincoln LS 3.0 V6 24V (190 Hp) 2000Overall Score69.25/100
WINNER
Lincoln LS
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
68.5–69.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mitsubishi FTOSpecificationLincoln LS
MitsubishiMakeLincoln
FTOModelLS
2000Model year2000
CoupeBody typeSedan
2Seats5
2Doors4
Performance
Mitsubishi FTOSpecificationLincoln LS
0 km/hTop speed190 km/h
2972 ccEngine displacement2967 cc
225 HPPower190 HP
275 NmTorque270 Nm
6Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Mitsubishi FTOSpecificationLincoln LS
PetrolFuel typePetrol
75 ltFuel tank68 lt
—Urban consumption12 lt
—Extra-urban consumption8 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Mitsubishi FTOSpecificationLincoln LS
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
225/50 R17Tyre size215/60 R16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Mitsubishi FTOSpecificationLincoln LS
4590 mmLength4925 mm
1840 mmWidth1860 mm
1285 mmHeight1425 mm
1670 KgWeight1665 Kg
2470 mmWheelbase2908 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Mitsubishi FTO and 2000 Lincoln LS approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Lincoln LS leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VSImage unavailableChrysler Intrepid vs Mitsubishi FTO2000 and 2000 model years
VSImage unavailableToyota Sienna vs Mitsubishi FTO2000 and 2000 model yearsImage unavailableVSImage unavailableMitsubishi FTO vs Mitsubishi FTO1999 and 2000 model years
VSImage unavailableAlfa Romeo 166 vs Mitsubishi FTO1999 and 2000 model yearsImage unavailableVSImage unavailableLincoln LS vs Mitsubishi FTO2000 and 2000 model yearsComments are loading…