2000 • Mitsubishi
FTO
Mitsubishi FTO 3.0 i V6 24V (225 Hp) 2000Overall Score68.5/100
2000 Mitsubishi FTO vs 2000 Chrysler Intrepid Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Chrysler
Intrepid
Chrysler Intrepid 3.2 i V6 24V (228 Hp) 2000Overall Score67.75/100
WINNER
Mitsubishi FTO
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
68.5–67.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mitsubishi FTOSpecificationChrysler Intrepid
MitsubishiMakeChrysler
FTOModelIntrepid
2000Model year2000
CoupeBody typeSedan
2Seats4
2Doors5
Performance
Mitsubishi FTOSpecificationChrysler Intrepid
—0–100 km/h10,5 s
0 km/hTop speed200 km/h
2972 ccEngine displacement3231 cc
225 HPPower228 HP
275 NmTorque305 Nm
6Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Mitsubishi FTOSpecificationChrysler Intrepid
PetrolFuel typePetrol
75 ltFuel tank64 lt
—Urban consumption12,4 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Mitsubishi FTOSpecificationChrysler Intrepid
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
225/50 R17Tyre size225/60 R16
YesABS—
Dimensions
Mitsubishi FTOSpecificationChrysler Intrepid
4590 mmLength5174 mm
1840 mmWidth1900 mm
1285 mmHeight1420 mm
1670 KgWeight1630 Kg
2470 mmWheelbase2870 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Mitsubishi FTO and 2000 Chrysler Intrepid approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mitsubishi FTO leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VSImage unavailableChrysler Intrepid vs Mitsubishi FTO2000 and 2000 model years
VSImage unavailableToyota Sienna vs Mitsubishi FTO2000 and 2000 model yearsImage unavailableVSImage unavailableMitsubishi FTO vs Mitsubishi FTO1999 and 2000 model years
VSImage unavailableAlfa Romeo 166 vs Mitsubishi FTO1999 and 2000 model yearsImage unavailableVSImage unavailableLincoln LS vs Mitsubishi FTO2000 and 2000 model yearsComments are loading…