DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1998 Mitsubishi FTO vs 1998 Toyota Altezza Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Toyota Altezza

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

67.5–68.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeToyota
FTOModelAltezza
1998Model year1998
CoupeBody typeSedan
2Seats5
2Doors4

Performance

220 km/hTop speed180 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1988 cc
170 HPPower160 HP
186 NmTorque200 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank60 lt
—Urban consumption14 lt
—Extra-urban consumption8 lt
16,6 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears6
195/60 R15 HTyre size195/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4320 mmLength4400 mm
1735 mmWidth1725 mm
1300 mmHeight1420 mm
1150 KgWeight1350 Kg
2500 mmWheelbase2670 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1998 Mitsubishi FTO and 1998 Toyota Altezza approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Toyota Altezza leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…