DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1998 Mitsubishi FTO vs 1998 Dodge Avenger Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi FTO

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

67.5–67.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeDodge
FTOModelAvenger
1998Model year1998
CoupeBody typeCoupe
2Seats5
2Doors2

Performance

220 km/hTop speed180 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1996 cc
170 HPPower141 HP
186 NmTorque177 Nm
6Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank60 lt
—Urban consumption10,7 lt
—Extra-urban consumption7,4 lt
16,6 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/60 R15 HTyre size195/70 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4320 mmLength4755 mm
1735 mmWidth1740 mm
1300 mmHeight1346 mm
1150 KgWeight1306 Kg
2500 mmWheelbase2635 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1998 Mitsubishi FTO and 1998 Dodge Avenger approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi FTO leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…