DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1999 Mitsubishi FTO vs 1999 Audi A4 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi FTO

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

64.5–63.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeAudi
FTOModelA4
1999Model year1999
CoupeBody typeSedan
2Seats5
2Doors4

Performance

—0–100 km/h10,7 s
200 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1834 ccEngine displacement1896 cc
126 HPPower116 HP
161 NmTorque285 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank62 lt
—Urban consumption6,8 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4,4 lt
17,8 ltAverage consumption5,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/70 R14 STyre size195/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4320 mmLength4479 mm
1735 mmWidth1733 mm
1300 mmHeight1415 mm
1100 KgWeight1285 Kg
2500 mmWheelbase2617 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1999 Mitsubishi FTO and 1999 Audi A4 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi FTO leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…