1999 • Audi
A4
Audi A4 1.9 TDI (116 Hp) 1999Overall Score63.5/100
1999 Audi A4 vs 1999 Mitsubishi FTO Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1999 • Mitsubishi
FTO
Mitsubishi FTO 1.8 i 16V GS (126 Hp) 1999Overall Score64.5/100
WINNER
Mitsubishi FTO
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
63.5–64.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Audi A4SpecificationMitsubishi FTO
AudiMakeMitsubishi
A4ModelFTO
1999Model year1999
SedanBody typeCoupe
5Seats2
4Doors2
Performance
Audi A4SpecificationMitsubishi FTO
10,7 s0–100 km/h—
200 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1896 ccEngine displacement1834 cc
116 HPPower126 HP
285 NmTorque161 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Audi A4SpecificationMitsubishi FTO
DieselFuel typePetrol
62 ltFuel tank60 lt
6,8 ltUrban consumption—
4,4 ltExtra-urban consumption—
5,3 ltAverage consumption17,8 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Audi A4SpecificationMitsubishi FTO
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size185/70 R14 S
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Audi A4SpecificationMitsubishi FTO
4479 mmLength4320 mm
1733 mmWidth1735 mm
1415 mmHeight1300 mm
1285 KgWeight1100 Kg
2617 mmWheelbase2500 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1999 Audi A4 and 1999 Mitsubishi FTO approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mitsubishi FTO leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…