DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor vs 2004 Ford Mustang Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Mustang

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

68.5–69.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeFord
EndeavorModelMustang
2004Model year2004
Off-road vehicleBody typeCabriolet
5Seats2+2
5Doors2

Performance

9,4 s0–100 km/h—
180 km/hTop speed180 km/h
3828 ccEngine displacement3813 cc
218 HPPower190 HP
339 NmTorque220 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
81 ltFuel tank58 lt
13,9 ltUrban consumption11,8 lt
10,2 ltExtra-urban consumption7,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears4
P235/65 R17Tyre size205/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4830 mmLength4653 mm
1870 mmWidth1857 mm
1768 mmHeight1350 mm
1795 KgWeight1455 Kg
2750 mmWheelbase2573 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor and 2004 Ford Mustang approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Mustang leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…