DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2005 Holden Caprice vs 2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi Endeavor

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

67.75–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

HoldenMakeMitsubishi
CapriceModelEndeavor
2005Model year2004
SedanBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

9,7 s0–100 km/h9,4 s
0 km/hTop speed180 km/h
3791 ccEngine displacement3828 cc
200 HPPower218 HP
304 NmTorque339 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
75 ltFuel tank81 lt
12 ltUrban consumption13,9 lt
7,4 ltExtra-urban consumption10,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears5
225/55 R16 VTyre sizeP235/65 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5237 mmLength4830 mm
1847 mmWidth1870 mm
1459 mmHeight1768 mm
1690 KgWeight1795 Kg
2939 mmWheelbase2750 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2005 Holden Caprice and 2004 Mitsubishi Endeavor approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi Endeavor leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…