DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Mitsubishi Dion vs 2002 Rover 45 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi Dion

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

63.25–62.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeRover
DionModel45
2002Model year2002
MinivanBody typeSedan
7Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

—0–100 km/h9,5 s
180 km/hTop speed203 km/h
1997 ccEngine displacement1997 cc
135 HPPower150 HP
183 NmTorque185 Nm
4Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank55 lt
13 ltUrban consumption14 lt
8 ltExtra-urban consumption6,7 lt
—Average consumption9,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
195/65 R14Tyre size205/45 R16 V
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4460 mmLength4517 mm
1695 mmWidth1696 mm
1650 mmHeight1394 mm
1380 KgWeight1340 Kg
2705 mmWheelbase2620 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Mitsubishi Dion and 2002 Rover 45 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi Dion leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…