DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Rover 45 vs 2002 Mitsubishi Dion Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi Dion

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

62.5–63.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RoverMakeMitsubishi
45ModelDion
2002Model year2002
SedanBody typeMinivan
5Seats7
4Doors5

Performance

9,5 s0–100 km/h—
203 km/hTop speed180 km/h
1997 ccEngine displacement1997 cc
150 HPPower135 HP
185 NmTorque183 Nm
6Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank60 lt
14 ltUrban consumption13 lt
6,7 ltExtra-urban consumption8 lt
9,4 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
205/45 R16 VTyre size195/65 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4517 mmLength4460 mm
1696 mmWidth1695 mm
1394 mmHeight1650 mm
1340 KgWeight1380 Kg
2620 mmWheelbase2705 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Rover 45 and 2002 Mitsubishi Dion approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi Dion leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…