2002 • Mitsubishi
Dingo
Mitsubishi Dingo 1.3 i 16V (80 Hp) 2002Overall Score52.5/100
2002 Mitsubishi Dingo vs 2002 Ford Focus Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2002 • Ford
Focus
Ford Focus 1.8 Turbo DI (90 Hp) 2002Overall Score53.25/100
WINNER
Ford Focus
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
52.5–53.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mitsubishi DingoSpecificationFord Focus
MitsubishiMakeFord
DingoModelFocus
2002Model year2002
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors3/5
Performance
Mitsubishi DingoSpecificationFord Focus
—0–100 km/h12,4 s
0 km/hTop speed184 km/h
1298 ccEngine displacement1753 cc
80 HPPower90 HP
118 NmTorque200 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Mitsubishi DingoSpecificationFord Focus
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
50 ltFuel tank53 lt
—Urban consumption6,7 lt
—Extra-urban consumption3,9 lt
—Average consumption5,1 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Mitsubishi DingoSpecificationFord Focus
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
175/70 R14Tyre size195/60 R15
—ABSYes
Dimensions
Mitsubishi DingoSpecificationFord Focus
3905 mmLength4152 mm
1695 mmWidth1698 mm
1635 mmHeight1430 mm
1140 KgWeight1183 Kg
2440 mmWheelbase2615 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2002 Mitsubishi Dingo and 2002 Ford Focus approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford Focus leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…