2002 • Ford
Focus
Ford Focus 1.8 Turbo DI (90 Hp) 2002Overall Score53.25/100
2002 Ford Focus vs 2002 Mitsubishi Dingo Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2002 • Mitsubishi
Dingo
Mitsubishi Dingo 1.3 i 16V (80 Hp) 2002Overall Score52.5/100
WINNER
Ford Focus
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
53.25–52.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford FocusSpecificationMitsubishi Dingo
FordMakeMitsubishi
FocusModelDingo
2002Model year2002
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
3/5Doors5
Performance
Ford FocusSpecificationMitsubishi Dingo
12,4 s0–100 km/h—
184 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1753 ccEngine displacement1298 cc
90 HPPower80 HP
200 NmTorque118 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Ford FocusSpecificationMitsubishi Dingo
DieselFuel typePetrol
53 ltFuel tank50 lt
6,7 ltUrban consumption—
3,9 ltExtra-urban consumption—
5,1 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Ford FocusSpecificationMitsubishi Dingo
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
195/60 R15Tyre size175/70 R14
YesABS—
Dimensions
Ford FocusSpecificationMitsubishi Dingo
4152 mmLength3905 mm
1698 mmWidth1695 mm
1430 mmHeight1635 mm
1183 KgWeight1140 Kg
2615 mmWheelbase2440 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2002 Ford Focus and 2002 Mitsubishi Dingo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford Focus leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…