2000 • Mitsubishi
Dingo
Mitsubishi Dingo 1.3 i 16V (80 Hp) 2000Overall Score52.5/100
2000 Mitsubishi Dingo vs 1997 Geo Metro Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1997 • Geo
Metro
Geo Metro 1.3 (70 Hp) 1997Overall Score51.5/100
WINNER
Mitsubishi Dingo
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
52.5–51.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mitsubishi DingoSpecificationGeo Metro
MitsubishiMakeGeo
DingoModelMetro
2000Model year1997
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats4
5Doors2
Performance
Mitsubishi DingoSpecificationGeo Metro
0 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1298 ccEngine displacement1298 cc
80 HPPower70 HP
118 NmTorque100 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Mitsubishi DingoSpecificationGeo Metro
PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank40 lt
—Average consumption5,8 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Mitsubishi DingoSpecificationGeo Metro
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
175/70 R14Tyre size125/80 R13
Dimensions
Mitsubishi DingoSpecificationGeo Metro
3905 mmLength4166 mm
1695 mmWidth1590 mm
1635 mmHeight1407 mm
1140 KgWeight826 Kg
2440 mmWheelbase—
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Mitsubishi Dingo and 1997 Geo Metro approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mitsubishi Dingo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VSMercedes-Benz A Serisi vs Mitsubishi Dingo2000 and 2000 model years
VSAudi A2 vs Mitsubishi Dingo2000 and 2000 model years
VSMitsubishi Dingo vs Mitsubishi Dingo1999 and 2000 model years
VSSuzuki Jimny vs Mitsubishi Dingo1999 and 2000 model yearsImage unavailableVSNissan AD vs Mitsubishi Dingo1999 and 2000 model yearsComments are loading…