2000 • Audi
A2
Audi A2 1.4i 16V (75 Hp) 2000Overall Score52.25/100
2000 Audi A2 vs 2000 Mitsubishi Dingo Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Mitsubishi
Dingo
Mitsubishi Dingo 1.3 i 16V (80 Hp) 2000Overall Score52.5/100
WINNER
Mitsubishi Dingo
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.
52.25–52.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Audi A2SpecificationMitsubishi Dingo
AudiMakeMitsubishi
A2ModelDingo
2000Model year2000
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Audi A2SpecificationMitsubishi Dingo
12,3 s0–100 km/h—
173 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1390 ccEngine displacement1298 cc
75 HPPower80 HP
126 NmTorque118 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Audi A2SpecificationMitsubishi Dingo
PetrolFuel typePetrol
42 ltFuel tank50 lt
8,1 ltUrban consumption—
4,6 ltExtra-urban consumption—
5,9 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Audi A2SpecificationMitsubishi Dingo
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
175/60 R15Tyre size175/70 R14
YesABS—
Dimensions
Audi A2SpecificationMitsubishi Dingo
3826 mmLength3905 mm
1673 mmWidth1695 mm
1553 mmHeight1635 mm
995 KgWeight1140 Kg
2405 mmWheelbase2440 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Audi A2 and 2000 Mitsubishi Dingo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mitsubishi Dingo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…