DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1998 Mitsubishi Debonair vs 1998 Ford Taurus Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Taurus

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

64.5–65.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeFord
DebonairModelTaurus
1998Model year1998
SedanBody typeEstate
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

0 km/hTop speed180 km/h
2972 ccEngine displacement2986 cc
150 HPPower147 HP
226 NmTorque230 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
105 ltFuel tank61 lt
—Urban consumption11,8 lt
—Extra-urban consumption8,1 lt
8,8 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears4
205/65 R15 HTyre size205/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4975 mmLength5070 mm
1815 mmWidth1854 mm
1440 mmHeight1463 mm
—Weight1579 Kg
2745 mmWheelbase2756 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1998 Mitsubishi Debonair and 1998 Ford Taurus approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Taurus leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…