DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1998 Mercury Sable vs 1998 Mitsubishi Debonair Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mercury Sable

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

65.25–64.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MercuryMakeMitsubishi
SableModelDebonair
1998Model year1998
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

190 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2986 ccEngine displacement2972 cc
147 HPPower150 HP
230 NmTorque226 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
61 ltFuel tank105 lt
12,4 ltUrban consumption—
8,4 ltExtra-urban consumption—
—Average consumption8,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears4
205/65 R15Tyre size205/65 R15 H
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5070 mmLength4975 mm
1850 mmWidth1815 mm
1410 mmHeight1440 mm
1535 KgWeight—
2760 mmWheelbase2745 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1998 Mercury Sable and 1998 Mitsubishi Debonair approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mercury Sable leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…