DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1992 Mitsubishi Colt vs 1992 Audi 100 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi Colt

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

58.5–58.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeAudi
ColtModel100
1992Model year1992
HatchbackBody typeEstate
5Seats5
3Doors5

Performance

7,6 s0–100 km/h10,4 s
210 km/hTop speed196 km/h
1834 ccEngine displacement1984 cc
140 HPPower137 HP
167 NmTorque168 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
0 ltFuel tank80 lt
—Urban consumption11,1 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6,7 lt
—Average consumption7,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
—Tyre size195/65 R15
—ABSYes

Dimensions

3950 mmLength4790 mm
1690 mmWidth1777 mm
1370 mmHeight1440 mm
995 KgWeight1375 Kg
—Wheelbase2687 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1992 Mitsubishi Colt and 1992 Audi 100 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi Colt leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…