1992 • Audi
100
Audi 100 2.0 16V (137 Hp) 1992Overall Score58.25/100
1992 Audi 100 vs 1992 Mitsubishi Colt Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1992 • Mitsubishi
Colt
Mitsubishi Colt 1.8 GTi (140 Hp) 1992Overall Score58.5/100
WINNER
Mitsubishi Colt
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.
58.25–58.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Audi 100SpecificationMitsubishi Colt
AudiMakeMitsubishi
100ModelColt
1992Model year1992
EstateBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors3
Performance
Audi 100SpecificationMitsubishi Colt
10,4 s0–100 km/h7,6 s
196 km/hTop speed210 km/h
1984 ccEngine displacement1834 cc
137 HPPower140 HP
168 NmTorque167 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Audi 100SpecificationMitsubishi Colt
PetrolFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank0 lt
11,1 ltUrban consumption—
6,7 ltExtra-urban consumption—
7,8 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Audi 100SpecificationMitsubishi Colt
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size—
YesABS—
Dimensions
Audi 100SpecificationMitsubishi Colt
4790 mmLength3950 mm
1777 mmWidth1690 mm
1440 mmHeight1370 mm
1375 KgWeight995 Kg
2687 mmWheelbase—
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1992 Audi 100 and 1992 Mitsubishi Colt approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mitsubishi Colt leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…