DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1994 Mitsubishi Colt vs 1994 Mitsubishi Space Runner Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi Colt

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

46.25–45.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeMitsubishi
ColtModelSpace Runner
1994Model year1994
HatchbackBody typeMinivan
5Seats5
3Doors5

Performance

10,5 s0–100 km/h17,8 s
185 km/hTop speed155 km/h
1597 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
90 HPPower82 HP
137 NmTorque172 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
50 ltFuel tank55 lt
—Urban consumption8,0 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6,5 lt
6,9 ltAverage consumption7,0 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/70 R13Tyre size185/70 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3880 mmLength4270 mm
1680 mmWidth1695 mm
1365 mmHeight1665 mm
1050 KgWeight1260 Kg
2415 mmWheelbase2520 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1994 Mitsubishi Colt and 1994 Mitsubishi Space Runner approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi Colt leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…