1994 • Audi
80
Audi 80 1.9 TD (75 Hp) 1994Overall Score47.25/100
1994 Audi 80 vs 1994 Mitsubishi Colt Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1994 • Mitsubishi
Colt
Mitsubishi Colt 1.6 (90 Hp) 1994Overall Score46.25/100
WINNER
Audi 80
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
47.25–46.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Audi 80SpecificationMitsubishi Colt
AudiMakeMitsubishi
80ModelColt
1994Model year1994
EstateBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors3
Performance
Audi 80SpecificationMitsubishi Colt
17,5 s0–100 km/h10,5 s
162 km/hTop speed185 km/h
1896 ccEngine displacement1597 cc
75 HPPower90 HP
140 NmTorque137 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Audi 80SpecificationMitsubishi Colt
DieselFuel typePetrol
66 ltFuel tank50 lt
7,9 ltUrban consumption—
5,1 ltExtra-urban consumption—
6,7 ltAverage consumption6,9 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Audi 80SpecificationMitsubishi Colt
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size175/70 R13
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Audi 80SpecificationMitsubishi Colt
4482 mmLength3880 mm
1695 mmWidth1680 mm
1408 mmHeight1365 mm
1270 KgWeight1050 Kg
2612 mmWheelbase2415 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1994 Audi 80 and 1994 Mitsubishi Colt approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Audi 80 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…