DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1994 Mitsubishi Colt vs 1994 Audi 80 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Audi 80

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

46.25–47.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeAudi
ColtModel80
1994Model year1994
HatchbackBody typeEstate
5Seats5
3Doors5

Performance

10,5 s0–100 km/h17,5 s
185 km/hTop speed162 km/h
1597 ccEngine displacement1896 cc
90 HPPower75 HP
137 NmTorque140 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
50 ltFuel tank66 lt
—Urban consumption7,9 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5,1 lt
6,9 ltAverage consumption6,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/70 R13Tyre size195/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3880 mmLength4482 mm
1680 mmWidth1695 mm
1365 mmHeight1408 mm
1050 KgWeight1270 Kg
2415 mmWheelbase2612 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1994 Mitsubishi Colt and 1994 Audi 80 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Audi 80 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…