DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Mitsubishi Colt vs 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi Lancer

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

56.25–56.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeMitsubishi
ColtModelLancer
2004Model year2004
HatchbackBody type—
5Seats—
5Doors—

Performance

9,9 s0–100 km/h—
180 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1493 ccEngine displacement1468 cc
95 HPPower105 HP
210 NmTorque140 Nm
3Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
47 ltFuel tank0 lt
5,9 ltUrban consumption—
3,9 ltExtra-urban consumption—
4,6 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/65 R14Tyre size—
YesABS—

Dimensions

3870 mmLength—
1695 mmWidth—
1550 mmHeight—
1085 KgWeight—
2500 mmWheelbase—

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Mitsubishi Colt and 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi Lancer leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…