DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Honda City vs 2004 Mitsubishi Colt Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Honda City

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

56.5–56.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

HondaMakeMitsubishi
CityModelColt
2004Model year2004
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h9,9 s
0 km/hTop speed180 km/h
1493 ccEngine displacement1493 cc
105 HPPower95 HP
129 NmTorque210 Nm
4Cylinders3

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
45 ltFuel tank47 lt
—Urban consumption5,9 lt
—Extra-urban consumption3,9 lt
—Average consumption4,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/70 R13Tyre size175/65 R14
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4225 mmLength3870 mm
1690 mmWidth1695 mm
1400 mmHeight1550 mm
940 KgWeight1085 Kg
2500 mmWheelbase2500 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Honda City and 2004 Mitsubishi Colt approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Honda City leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…