DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1999 Mitsubishi Challenger vs 2001 Nissan Pathfinder Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan Pathfinder

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

67.5–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeNissan
ChallengerModelPathfinder
1999Model year2001
Off-road vehicleBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

10,0 s0–100 km/h9,2 s
190 km/hTop speed164 km/h
3497 ccEngine displacement3498 cc
245 HPPower243 HP
343 NmTorque359 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
74 ltFuel tank80 lt
17 ltUrban consumption15,7 lt
10 ltExtra-urban consumption14,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
5Gears4
265/70 R15Tyre size255/65 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4530 mmLength4640 mm
1775 mmWidth1820 mm
1730 mmHeight1800 mm
1950 KgWeight1990 Kg
2725 mmWheelbase2700 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1999 Mitsubishi Challenger and 2001 Nissan Pathfinder approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan Pathfinder leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…