DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Mitsubishi Challenger vs 1999 Mitsubishi Challenger Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi Challenger

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

68.5–67.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeMitsubishi
ChallengerModelChallenger
2000Model year1999
Off-road vehicleBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

10,0 s0–100 km/h10,0 s
190 km/hTop speed190 km/h
3497 ccEngine displacement3497 cc
245 HPPower245 HP
343 NmTorque343 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
74 ltFuel tank74 lt
17 ltUrban consumption17 lt
10 ltExtra-urban consumption10 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
5Gears5
265/70 R15Tyre size265/70 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4530 mmLength4530 mm
1775 mmWidth1775 mm
1730 mmHeight1730 mm
1950 KgWeight1950 Kg
2725 mmWheelbase2725 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Mitsubishi Challenger and 1999 Mitsubishi Challenger approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi Challenger leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…