DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1999 Mitsubishi Challenger vs 2000 Honda Shuttle Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Honda Shuttle

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

67.5–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeHonda
ChallengerModelShuttle
1999Model year2000
Off-road vehicleBody typeMinivan
5Seats7
5Doors4

Performance

10,0 s0–100 km/h8,1 s
190 km/hTop speed190 km/h
3497 ccEngine displacement3471 cc
245 HPPower243 HP
343 NmTorque328 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
74 ltFuel tank75 lt
17 ltUrban consumption13,1 lt
10 ltExtra-urban consumption9,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
265/70 R15Tyre size225/60 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4530 mmLength5110 mm
1775 mmWidth1920 mm
1730 mmHeight1740 mm
1950 KgWeight1990 Kg
2725 mmWheelbase3000 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1999 Mitsubishi Challenger and 2000 Honda Shuttle approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Honda Shuttle leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…