DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2001 Mitsubishi Challenger vs 2001 Volkswagen Golf Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi Challenger

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

69.25–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeVolkswagen
ChallengerModelGolf
2001Model year2001
Off-road vehicleBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors3/5

Performance

—0–100 km/h7,1 s
170 km/hTop speed235 km/h
2972 ccEngine displacement2792 cc
185 HPPower204 HP
265 NmTorque270 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
74 ltFuel tank62 lt
16 ltUrban consumption15,3 lt
10 ltExtra-urban consumption8,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
4Gears6
265/70 R15Tyre size205/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4530 mmLength4149 mm
1775 mmWidth1735 mm
1730 mmHeight1439 mm
1830 KgWeight1400 Kg
2725 mmWheelbase2518 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2001 Mitsubishi Challenger and 2001 Volkswagen Golf approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi Challenger leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…